Practice Message from the NES BCH Financial Remedies Court Practice Message from the NES BCH Financial Remedies Court March 2022practice-message-from-the-nes-bch-financial-remedies-court-march-2022.pdf125 KBdownload-circle
ND v LD (Financial Remedy: Needs) [2022] EWFC B15 https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWFC/OJ/2022/B15.html DDJ Arshad. Rare reported DDJ decision in modest asset case. Discusses special measures (including some rather unusual) taken before and during hearing in light of H’s mental health and (notwithstanding his capacity) suicidal ideation. Both parties’ housing needs
E v B (Interim Maintenance Inaccurate Time Estimate) [2021] EWFC B90 https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWFC/OJ/2021/90.html Recorder Chandler. W’s application for interim maintenance and costs allowance in proceedings under Part III. Robust assumptions were made about H’s ability to pay, and W was awarded £3,000 pcm interim maintenance. W’s application for
Local guidance to Greater Manchester practitioners on documents needed at first appointments Local guidance to Greater Manchester practitioners on documents needed at first appointmentslocal-guidance-to-greater-manchester-practitioners-on-documents-needed-at-first-appointments.pdf94 KBdownload-circle
MG v GM [2022] EWFC 8 https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWFC/HCJ/2022/8.html MPS and LSPO application by W in a case described by Peel J as 'a battle royale' ([3]). Each party denied holding liquid assets, and asserted the other had access to significant wealth. Peel J decided that
A v M [2021] EWFC 89 https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWFC/HCJ/2021/89.html Mostyn J. H worked in private equity and had set up two funds of his own, W was the beneficiary of valuable trust funds. Mostyn J set out a detailed method for dealing with H’s carried interest (in